Welcome to PhiloLogic  
   home |  the ARTFL project |  download |  documentation |  sample databases |   
Stowe, Harriet Beecher, 1811-1896 [1871], My wife and I, or, Harry Henderson's history. (JB Ford & Company, New York) [word count] [eaf467T].
To look up a word in a dictionary, select the word with your mouse and press 'd' on your keyboard.

Previous section

Next section

CHAPTER XXI. I DISCOVER THE BEAUTIES OF FRIENDSHIP.

[figure description] Page 226.[end figure description]

MUCH has been written lately concerning the doctrine
of friendship between men and women. It is
thought and said by some that there lies an unexplored
territory in our American life, and we have the example
of Madame Récamier set before us to show how perfectly
intimate and devoted a whole circle of manly friends may
be with one fair woman, without detriment or disadvantage
to their domestic ties or hers. The adorable Juliet is
the intimate friend at once of Matthew Montmorenci, the
saint, of Chateaubriand, the poet, and of an indefinite number
of artists and men of letters, all of whom address her
in language of adoration and devotion, and receive from
her affectionate messages in return. Chateaubriand spends
every afternoon with Juliet, and every evening with his
invalid wife, like a devoted and dutiful husband, and this
state of things goes on from year to year without trouble
and without scandal.

It was with some such sublimated precedent in my head
that I allowed myself to yield to the charming temptation
opened to me by my acquaintance with Eva Van Arsdel.
Supposing by Jim's account that she was already engaged,
looking on myself as yet far off from the place where I
could think of marriage, what was there to hinder my
enjoying her society? Of course, there was no possible danger
to myself, and it would be absolute coxcombry to think
that there would be any to her. She, who had been a queen
of fashion, and who had the world under her feet, if she
deigned to think kindly of a poor littérateur, it could surely
lead to nothing dangerous. I might have been warned, if I

-- 227 --

[figure description] Page 227.[end figure description]

were wise, by the fact that the night after my first presentation
I lay awake and thought over all she had said,
and counted the days that should intervene before next
Wednesday evening. I would not for the world have had
Jim Fellows divine what was going on within me; in fact I
took as much pains to cajole and pacify and take myself in
as if I had been a third party.

I woke about six o'clock in the dim grey of the next
morning, from a dream in which Eva and I were talking
together, when she seemed so vivid that I started up almost
feeling that I saw her face in the air. Suddenly I heard the
bell of a neighboring church strike the hour, and thought
of what she had said the evening before about attending
morning services.

What was to hinder my going to the church and seeing
her again? There was a brisk morning walk, that was a
good thing, and certainly morning devotion was something
so altogether right and reasonable that I wondered I
never had thought of it before. I dressed myself and
turned out into the streets to seek the little church of
the Holy Sepulcher where the new Rector of whom Eva
had spoken held early Lenten services.

There was something quaint and rather exciting to my
imagination to be one of a small band who sought the
church at this early hour. The sunlight of the rising day
streamed through the painted window and touched with a
sort of glory the white dress of the priest; the organ played
softly in subdued melody, and the words of the morning
service had a sort of touching lovely sound. “Where two
or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in
the midst of them” seemed to come to my thoughts with
new force as I looked on the small number, two or three
in a pew, who were scattered up and down through the
church. She was there in a seat not far from me, shrouded
in a simple black dress and veil, and seemed wholly and entirely
absorbed by her prayer-book and devotions.

-- 228 --

[figure description] Page 228.[end figure description]

As the little company dispersed at the close of the services,
I stood in the door and joined her as she passed out.

“Good morning, Miss Van Arsdel,” I said.

She started and looked surprised, and a bright color
flushed in her cheeks.

“Mr. Henderson! you quite astonish me.”

“Why so?”

“There are so very few who get out at this hour; and
you, I believe, are not of the church.”

“I don't know what you mean by the church, exactly,”
said I.

“Oh,” said she, looking at me with a conscious smile, “I
know what everybody means that says the church—it generally
means our church—the one that is the church for
us; but you, I think, belong to the Bethany,” she added.

“I do,” said I, “but I have large sympathies for all others,
particularly for yours, which seems to me in some points
more worthily to represent what a church should be, than
any other.”

She looked pleased, and said with warmth, “Mr. Henderson,
you must not judge our church by such very imperfect
specimens as you see among us. We are very unworthy
children of a noble mother; our church has everything in it
to call us to the highest and best life, only we fall far
below her teaching.”

“I think I can see,” I said, “that if the scheme of living
set forth by the Episcopal Church were carried out with
warmth and devotion, it would make an ideal sort of society.”

“It would be a really consecrated life,” she said, with
warmth. “If all would agree to unite in daily morning
and evening prayers for instance,” she said, “how
beautiful it would be.” “I never enjoy reading my Bible
alone in my room as I do to have it read to me here in
church; somehow to me there is a sacred charm about it
when I hear it read there, and then to have friends, neighbors
and families meet and pray together as one, every day,

-- 229 --

[figure description] Page 229.[end figure description]

would be beautiful. I often think I should like to live close
by one of those beautiful English cathedrals where they
have choral services every day, and I would go morning and
evening, but here, in this dreadful, flashy, busy, bustling
New York, there is no such thing, I suppose, as getting any
number of people to agree to daily worship.”

“In that respect,” said I, “we modern Christians seem
to be less devout than the ancient heathen or the Mohammedans;
you recollect Huju Buba sums up the difference between
the Englishman and the Persian by saying, `We Persians
pray seven times a day, and they, never.”'

“I like to come to church,” she said, “it seems a shelter
and a refuge. Nowadays there are so many things said that
one doesn't know what to think of; so many things disputed
that one has always supposed to be true; such a perfectly
fatiguing rush of ideas and assertions and new ways that
for my part I am glad to fall back upon something old and
established, that I feel sure isn't going to melt away into
mist before to-morrow.

“I can well appreciate that feeling,” I said, “for I have
it myself.”

“Do you? Oh, Mr. Henderson, you don't know how it
perplexes one. There's sister Ida, now! she has a circle of
friends—the very nicest sort of people they seem to be!—
but, dear me! when I am with them a little while, I get
perfectly bewildered. No two of them seem to believe
alike on any subject; and if you quote the Bible to them,
they just open their eyes and look amazed at you, as if
that was something quite behind the age; and as there is no
standard with them, of course there is nothing settled. You
feel as if life was built on water, and everything was rocking
and tilting till you are quite dizzy. Now, I know I am a
poor sort of a specimen of a Christian; but I couldn't live
so! I fly back from this sort of thing, like a frightened bird,
and take refuge in the church—there is something fixed,
positive, and definite, that has stood the test of time; it is
noble and dignified, and I abide by that.”

-- 230 --

[figure description] Page 230.[end figure description]

“There is all that about it,” said I; “and so very much
that is attractive and charming in the forms of your church,
that I think if you would only open your arms wide, and
be liberal as the spirit of this age, you would indeed be the
church of the world.”

“You think we are not liberal?” she said.

“When you call yourselves the church, and make no
account of all that true, pure, good souls—true followers of
the same Saviour—are doing, it seems to me you are not.”

“Ah, well, Mr. Henderson, perhaps we are wrong there—
I cannot say. I know there are many churches and many
dear, good souls in all; it is only to me that mine is the
church; if that is an illusion, it is a happy one.”

“Now,” said I, “what a dreary picture should we have of
New York Christianity, if we judged it by the few morning
worshipers at Lenten services!”

“Yes, indeed,” she said. I am often sorry for our rector—
he is so earnest, and so few care to come; and yet he told us
in his sermon, last Sunday, that these Lenten services were
an act of union with our Saviour's self-denials and sufferings.”

“Well, Miss Van Arsdel,” said I, “I doubt not there are
hundreds of thousands in this city who do really, in spirit,
unite with the Saviour in self-denials and sufferings, daily,
who do not express it in this form. If all who really love
the Saviour, and are living in his spirit, should make a point
of early morning service in Lent, I verily believe the
churches would be crowded to overflowing.”

“You do really think so?”

“I do. In spite of all that appears, I think ours is really, at
heart, a religious age—it is only that we do not agree in the
same external forms of expression.”

“But how beautiful! oh, how beautiful it would be if we
could!” she said. “Oh, it would be lovely if all the good and
true could see each other, and stand side by side! I long for
visible unity—and do you think, Mr. Henderson, we could
unite in more beautiful forms than ours?”

-- 231 --

[figure description] Page 231.[end figure description]

“No; I do not,” said I; “for me, for you, for many like
us, these are the true forms, and the best; but we must
remember that others have just as sacred associations, and
are as dearly attached to other modes of worship as we to
these.”

“Then you really do prefer them yourself?”

“Well, Miss Van Arsdel, I unite with the church of my
father and mother, because I was brought up in it; yet if I
were to choose another, it would be yours.”

She looked pleased, and I added: “It seems to me one of
the most beautiful things about it is a daily service.”

“Yes,” she said, “and it is pleasant to have churches
where you feel that worship is daily offered, whether people
attend or not. There was something sacred and beautiful
about the Church of St. Peter's in Rome—to think that at
every hour of day or night worship was going on in it. I
used to like to think of it when I awoke nights—that they
were praying and adoring there—in this cold, dreary world;
it seems as if it was like a Father's house, always light, and
warm, and open.”

“There is a beauty and use in all these forms and images,”
I said; “and I think if we are wise, we may take comfort in
them all, without being enslaved by any.”

Here our interview closed, as with a graceful salutation
she left me at the door of her house.

The smile she gave me was so bright and heart-warm, that
it lightened all my work through the day; a subtle sense of
a new and charming companionship began to shed itself
through all my labors, and, unconsciously and unwatched,
commenced that process of double thought which made
everything I read or wrote suggest something I wanted to
say to her. The reader will not, therefore, wonder that I
proved my sense of the beauty of a daily morning service
by going with great regularity after this, and as regularly
walking home with my enchanting companion.

I was innocently surprised to find how interesting the
morning scenery in prosaic old New York had become. It

-- 232 --

[figure description] Page 232.[end figure description]

was April, and the buds in the Park were swelling, and the
green grass springing in the cracks of the pavement, and
little sparrows twittered and nestled in the ivy that embowered
the church—and all these things had a strange, new
charm for me. I told myself, every day, that I was not in
love with Eva Van Arsdel, or going to be; I took myself to
witness that all our conversation was on the most correct
and dispassionate subjects, and not in the slightest degree
inclining to any vanity of that nature. Since then, I have
learned that Eva was the kind of woman with whom it
made no difference what the subject matter of conversation
was. It might be religion, or politics, or conic sections, but
the animus of it was sure to be the same thing. It was her
vital magnetism that gave the interest. It was, in fact,
hardly any matter what we talked about, or whether
we talked at all, it was the charm of being together that
made these morning interviews so delightful; though I
believe we discussed nearly everything under the sun, with
the most astonishing unanimity of sentiment.

I was very careful to keep the knowledge of my increasing
intimacy from Jim Fellows. Early rising was not his forte,
and I, very improperly, congratulated myself on the fewness
of the worshipers at early service. By and by, I grew
so conscious that I got a way of stealing out at an opposite
door, appearing to walk off another way, and joining Eva at
the next corner—lest haply my invariable constancy should
attract attention. She noticed all these things with a droll,
amused, little, half-conscious look. True daughter of Eve
as she was, she had probably seen many a shy fish before,
swimming around her golden net as artlessly as I was doing.

I soon became her obedient slave and servant, interpreting
all her motions and intimations with humble assiduity. Of
course I presented myself duly with Jim in the Wednesday
evening receptions, where, as the rooms were filled with
other company, we already began to practice an involuntary
hypocrisy, keeping up our friendly intimacy by that kind of
intuitive and undemonstrative communication natural to

-- 233 --

[figure description] Page 233.[end figure description]

those who know each other by sympathy, and learn to
understand each other without words.

I was a great deal in Ida's studio, probably much to
the satisfaction of Aunt Maria and Mrs. Van Arsdel—while
Eva glanced and twinkled in and out like a fire-fly in a
meadow, taking my heart with her as she came and went,
yet awing me with a dutiful reticence, lest “people should
talk.”

Ida was one of those calm, quiet, essentially self-poised
women, with whom it would be quite possible for a man to
have a very intimate friendship, without its toning off into
anything warm, either on her part or on his. Everything
with her was so positive and definite, that there was no
possibility of going over the limits. I think that she really
had a very warm esteem for me; but she looked at me and
judged me solely in relation to Eva, and with a quiet persistency
favored the intimacy that she saw growing between
us. Her plans of life were laid far ahead; she was wedded
to a purpose which she would not have renounced for
any man on earth; but Eva was the very apple of her eye,
and I think she had her own plans as to the settling of her
life's destiny; in short, Ida was from the start the best
friend I could have.

-- 234 --

p467-261
Previous section

Next section


Stowe, Harriet Beecher, 1811-1896 [1871], My wife and I, or, Harry Henderson's history. (JB Ford & Company, New York) [word count] [eaf467T].
Powered by PhiloLogic