Welcome to PhiloLogic  
   home |  the ARTFL project |  download |  documentation |  sample databases |   
Fay, Theodore S. (Theodore Sedgwick), 1807-1898 [1833], Crayon sketches [ed.]. Volume 1 (Conner and Cooke, New York) [word count] [eaf091v1].
To look up a word in a dictionary, select the word with your mouse and press 'd' on your keyboard.

Previous section

Next section

Main text

-- 013 --

p091-017 TRAVELING. MENTALLY AND BODILY.

[figure description] Page 013.[end figure description]

It is a wholesome thing to be what is commonly
termed “kicked about the world.” Not literally
“kicked”—not forcibly propelled by innumerable
feet from village to village, from town to town, or
from country to country, which can be neither
wholesome nor agreeable; but knocked about,
tossed about, irregularly jostled over the principal
portions of the two hemispheres; sleeping hard
and soft, living well when you can, and learning
to take what is barely edible and potable ungrumblingly
when there is no help for it. Certes, the
departure from home and old usages is any thing
but pleasant, especially at the outset. It is a sort of
secondary “weaning” which the juvenile has to undergo;
but like the first process, he is all the healthier
and hardier when it is over. In this way, it is
a wholesome thing to be tossed about the world.
To form odd acquaintance in ships, on the decks of
steam boats and tops of coaches; to pick up

-- 014 --

[figure description] Page 014.[end figure description]

temporary companions on turnpikes or by hedge-sides;
to see humanity in the rough, and learn what stuff
life is made of in different places; to mark the
shades and points of distinction in men, manners,
customs, cookery, and other important matters as
you stroll along. What an universal toleration it
begets! How it improves and enlarges a man's
physical and intellectual tastes and capacities! How
diminutively local and ridiculously lilliputian seem
his former experiences! He is now no longer bigotted
to a doctrine or a dish, but can fall in with
one, or eat of the other, however strange and foreign,
with a facility that is truly comfortable and
commendable: always, indeed, excepting, such
doctrines as affect the feelings and sentiments, which
he should ever keep “garner'd up” in his “heart of
hearts;” and also, always excepting the swallowing
of certain substances, so very peculiar in themselves,
and so strictly national, that the undisciplined
palate of the foreigner instinctively and utterly
rejects them, such as the frog of your Frenchman—
the garlic of your Spaniard—the compounds termed
sausages of your Cockney—the haggis of your
Scotchman—the train-oil of your Russian.

He has but little of the ardent spirit of boyhood,
or the mounting spirit of manhood in him, who can
quietly seat himself by his father's hearth, dear

-- 015 --

[figure description] Page 015.[end figure description]

though it be, until that hearth, by virtue of inheritance
becomes his own, without a wish to see how
the world wags beyond the walls of his native
town. How mulish and uncompromising he groweth
up! How very indocile and incredulous he
becometh! To him localities are truths—right is
wrong and wrong is right, just as they fall in with
or differ from the customs of his district; and all
that is rare or curious or strange or wonderful or
different from what he has been accustomed to, is
measured by the petty standard of his own experience,
and dogmatically censured or praised accordingly.
Such men are incurable, and what is worse,
legal nuisances—they can neither be abated by law
nor logic.

I like human nature of quite a different pattern.
A boy, especially, is all the better for a
strong infusion of credulity in his composition. He
should swallow an hyperbole unhesitatingly, and
digest it without difficulty. It is better for a juvenile
to be ingenuous than ingenious. It is better
for him to study Baron Munchausen than Poor
Richard's Maxims. The Baron's inventions fertilize
his imagination without injuring his love of truth;
Poor Richard's truisms teach him nothing but that
cold worldly wisdom he is almost sure to learn, and
learn too soon. Strong drink is not for babes and

-- 016 --

[figure description] Page 016.[end figure description]

sucklings; neither is miserly, hard-hearted proverbs—
“a penny saved is a penny earned”—“a groat a
day is a pound a year,” and such like arithmetical
wisdom. Keep it from them: it takes the edge
off their young sensibilities, and sets them calculating
their charities. They will learn selfishness soon
enough without taking regular lessons. The good
Samaritan, honest man, cared not a fig-leaf for such
axioms, or he too would have “passed by on the
other side.”

Not that I mean to question the utility of arithmetical
studies for children, or inculcate the neglect
of worthy proficients or professors therein. Hutton,
Tinwell, Bonnycastle, or more ancient Cocker;—
far from it, I have too severely ere now experienced
the ill-effects of slighting the multiplication table
and other loftier branches of arithmetic; but I could
not then help it. I was a great traveler when a
boy, though not in the body; in imagination I
had circumnavigated the globe. A book of voyages
and travels was to me better than a holiday, and I
devoured the pages of Wallis, Cartwright, Byron,
and other navigators with an appetite that now
seems to me to have been really preternatural. How
I used to trudge away, not unwillingly to school, if
I had only Robinson Crusoe (which was then a
most veritable and authentic document) smuggled

-- 017 --

[figure description] Page 017.[end figure description]

away in my satchel amidst grammars, dictionaries,
and other necessary and disagreeable productions.
Then Cook's Voyages! What an ocean of pleasure
to me were his ocean wanderings! How did they
divide, or rather completely abstract my faculties
from subtraction, multiplication, or division (short
or long)! I was sailing far away, in the good ship
Endeavor, over the illimitable Pacific,—what were
vulgar fractions to me? I coasted through the
Friendly Islands and took no heed of decimals;
and, as far at least as I was concerned, arithmetical
progression became stationary. I might be ostensibly
in practice; but my practice was to go on indulging
in stolen sweets “from morn till noon, from
noon till dewey eve,” until the awful hour of retribution
arrived, and I was called upon to exhibit the
sum total of my day's industry. This generally
consisted of one or more questions “cabbaged” or
stolen from some of my precursors in those difficulties.
Sometimes they passed muster; but oh! the
opaque darkness—the cheerless, hopeless, mental
blindness in which I found myself enveloped whenever
my worthy teacher requested me to “show how
I came by the answer.” How I came by it in one
sense—how improperly and feloniously I came by
it, I knew full well; but as for establishing any
legitimate claim to the product, as for showing by

-- 018 --

[figure description] Page 018.[end figure description]

any given process how the answer could be correctly
deduced from the premises, it was only a
waste of his time and mine to request such a thing.
Then poor left hand, came thy trial—“not for thine
own demerits but for mine,” fell blows from supple
cane or leathern thong right heavily on thee! Many
a blush and bruise La Perouse and Captain Cook
cost thee—ill-used member—unfortunate extremity.

But I was incorrigible. Blows and admonitions
were equally unavailable. I did not see or feel the
moral justice of either one or the other; they were
to me things of course—necessities, not judicious
punishments; inevitable consequences, which must
be endured and could not be avoided, and the next
day I was again amongst my old friends the islanders,
tattooing warriors, roasting dogs and marvelling
how such “strange flesh” would eat when cooked,
or performing any other equally curious or ingenious
operations. When not reading I was dreaming.
From the hubbub of the school I could transport
myself in a twinkling to some fair Otaheitan
isle—some speck of verdure that “lit the ocean with
a smile,” where summer, and gentle gales, and
beauteous flowers, and odoriferous species were perpetual;
and there, where “feathery cocoas fring'd
the bay,” would I lay myself down and watch the
breaking of the waves upon the sparkling shore,

-- 019 --

[figure description] Page 019.[end figure description]

until the tumbling of a slate or book, or the harsh
growl of the master, startled me from my day-dream
and brought me to a sense of things more immediate
and material. But I possessed in a high degree
the happy faculty of abstraction—a faculty that can
transplant you in an instant from the dullest scenes
and company to the brightest and gayest—and in a
few moments I was again “all abroad”—listening
to the roar of Niagara—scrambling over the blue
mountains of Jamaica—lolling in the orange groves
of the Indies,—until, after years of wandering I
would fancy myself returning to anxious friends
and old companions.

“When the flower was in the bud, and the leaf upon the tree,
With the lark to sing me hame to my ain countree.” What was the petty pain of a few blows (I never
felt the disgrace) to such visions of delight? Nothing.
And so I continued—a boy inured to stripes,
and utterly destitute of all marks or orders of merit—
the tail of my class—the superlative degree of
comparison for idleness and inability. No “specimen”
of my proficency in the art of chirography was
ever exhibited before company in the parlor of my
parents; nor
“When friends were met, and goblets crown'd,” was I ever called upon, like other boys, to

-- 020 --

[figure description] Page 020.[end figure description]

exemplify the beauties of the British Poets by my juvenile
powers of recitation.

I have traveled much in reality since then, and
beheld with the corporeal eye many of the scenes
and places that looked so surpassingly fair to my
inward vision in former times. I have become
“familiar with strange faces,” and have made
friends and acquaintance in far-off countries. But
time and the world have done their usual work
with me as with others. I am changed—vilely
sophisticated; the smoke of cities is upon my soul,
and innumerable trivial sensualities have imperceptibly
clogged the elastic spring of the spirit within
me. To enjoy the company of old mother nature
now, I must have “all appliances and means to
boot”—be easy and comfortable, neither hungry nor
athirst, instead of seeking her in every form and
mood as of yore. But this is the way, more or
less, with us all. As we grow up, we acquire an
unconscious preference for art above nature—we
love the country less and the town more, and shady
walks and “hedge rows green” are forsaken for wellpaved
streets and public promenades. We muddle
our brains with politics and political economy, and
form attachments to newspapers and distilled and
fermented liquors that it is often difficult to shake off.
Oh the lamentable deterioration of human nature!

-- 021 --

[figure description] Page 021.[end figure description]

We are the antipodes (to our disadvantage,) of even
the despised caterpillar tribe. We do not expand from
the grub into the butterfly, but degenerate from the
butterfly into the grub. When boys—or wingless
butterflies,—we disport in the free air and sunshine,
clad in the hues of health, and as free from care or
trouble as the lilies of the field. Every returning
day brings animation and enjoyment—
“Flowers in the valley, splendor in the beam,
Health in the gale, and freshness in the stream,” until the remorseless usages of the world apprentice
us to doctors, tailors, lawyers, merchants, shipwrights,
sugar-bakers, &c. to be initiated into their
respective mysteries; we grow up to be sallow,
bearded men—we herd together in cities—we monotonously
slink day after day from the dull obscurity
of our dwellings through dirty lanes and dusky
alleys to our strange occupations, and then crawl
back again — we snarl at and undermine each
other—we play with unbecoming zeal “much ado
about nothing” for a few years—we die some day
just when we did not want to do so—the living clod
is resolved into the lifeless one, and we become—a
dream, a recollection, a dimly-remembered thing,
of whom perchance, some singular custom or odd
saying is recorded, at intervals, for a brief space of

-- 022 --

[figure description] Page 022.[end figure description]

time, and then (to all worldly intents and purposes)
we are as if we had never been!

There is, however, to counterbalance the many
pleasures and advantages of traveling, one peculiar
unpleasant sensation, which nearly all who have
journeyed must have felt. It is, in passing away
from any place where you have been warmly welcomed
and hospitably treated—where you have
interchanged good offices, and eat and drank and
held pleasant communion with kindly pieces of
humanity—the thought that you pass away for
ever—that you will see then no more! Their joys
or sorrows, their smiles or tears, are thenceforward
nothing to you—you have no further portion in
them—you will know them no more! It is, in truth,
a most unpleasant feeling; but a man had better
suffer from it, than be without it. I do not, however,
relish that easily excited, indiscriminating
kindness, awakened on every occasion; that unvarying
civility—that ready-made sympathy so
common in this world of ours. I dislike your polite
smilers, on first acquaintance; fellows who will
shake you by the hand, bow, and smile at meeting;
and shake you by the hand, bow, and smile at
parting, with equal indifference. Though not
altogether to be commended, I rather prefer their
opposites—the race of unapproachables; persons of

-- 023 --

[figure description] Page 023.[end figure description]

cloudy and uninviting aspects, who station themselves
in the less frequented parts of steamboats,
and odd corners of stage-coaches; who speak when
they cannot help it, and with whom a civil sentence
seems the prelude to suffocation. When the ice is
once broken, when you do get acquainted with
them, there is often much good fruit under the
rough rind; and when the time for separating
arrives, they look half sulky, half sorrowful, as they
give you their hand—as much as to say, “we might
have been better friends, but your road lies that
way—and mine this, and so—good-by.” I would
be bail for one of those personages; I would put
my hand to a bond for him, (which I look upon to
be the extreme test of human confidence,) but for
your ever-ready smilers, they have, in general, no
more heart than an infantile cabbage—all leaves
and husk, husk and leaves—“let no such men be
trusted.”

-- 024 --

p091-028 DEBATING SOCIETIES.

[figure description] Page 024.[end figure description]

“There are many evils in the present state of society, which it is much
easier to censure than eradicate.”

Modern Moralist.

One of the most pernicious mischiefs of the present
times, and one most pregnant with the seeds of
individual discomfort and general unhappiness, is
the rapid increase of Debating Societies; or, rather,
societies for the annoyance of the community—
night-schools for the education of youth in flippancy
and sophistry—seminaries for the full developement
of the organ of self-sufficiency—arenas
for the exposure of the weakness of the human
intellect, and the depreciation of heaven's creatures
in the opinion of all considerate people. These
excrescences are springing into existence on every
side, and are productive of the most lamentable consequences.
When I see (as I have seen) a meek,
diffident juvenile of eighteen or nineteen, of the right
age to imbibe wholesome, quiet wisdom and nutritious
instruction—seduced from his darling books,
and peaceful solitary chamber, to attend one of those

-- 025 --

[figure description] Page 025.[end figure description]

pestiferous places, where, what they call “questions,”
are regularly discussed; when I see such an
one led on, step by step, by a little empty applause,
to exchange the modest diffidence that would gladly
learn, for the misplaced confidence that would
boldly teach, until he becomes, in the course of
time, a confirmed, hardened debater, lost to all sense
of shame and idea of propriety—a perpetual torment
to his more immediate relatives and connections,
and an unceasing nuisance to all the other
members of the great human family with whom he
may be brought into juxtaposition, I confess I cannot
but feel a strong distaste for those reprehensible
nurseries for bad speeches and worse arguments.

Reader! didst thou ever misspend a few hours at
a debating society? If so, then hast thou seen
“pitiful ambition” in all its infinite varieties, and
almost every stage and degree of folly, froth, and
fatuity. How didst thou preserve thy serenity?
Thou mightst have looked, indeed, with calm, contemplative
benevolence on some piece of leadenheaded
ignorance, who, after a week's cogitation,
gravely and seriously set about building up a reputation
by announcing that “virtue was its own
and best reward,” “vice eventually its own punishment,”
and other similar originalities; but there is
a species of reptile to be met with in those

-- 026 --

[figure description] Page 026.[end figure description]

congregations of raw intellects, that is, to me at least,
peculiarly and distressingly repulsive. It is generally
in the shape of a good-looking, smooth-faced,
self-sufficient, young gentleman, the leader, the
looked-up-to of the society, one skilled in quibbles,
quotations, and paradoxes; who thinks truth beneath
his advocacy, and makes a point of taking
what is called the “difficult side of the question,”
in order to show off his surplusage of uncommon
qualities, by confuting his humble satellites, who
ingloriously content themselves with a homely,
obvious view of the matter in dispute. I am not
naturally blood-thirsty; but still, when I have seen
an unwholesome piece of mortality of this kind get
up, all smirk, amiability, politeness, and complacency,
to refute, in the most urbane manner, some
truism lineally descended from Shem, Ham, or
Japhet, or, it may be, antediluvian, I confess I have
felt the destructive principle rising within me—I
have acknowledged my consanguinity to Cain—I
have—but no man is bound to be his own accuser.
“Our worser thoughts heaven mend.”

Yet there are people who contend that these dens
for the dislocation of grammar, for the maltreatment
of metaphors, and the ill-usage of all tropes and
figures whatsoever, these very debating societies,
are not only perfectly innocuous, but positively

-- 027 --

[figure description] Page 027.[end figure description]

beneficial; that they sharpen the tongues and faculties
of young men; that they accustom them to view
matters dispassionately, and examine both sides of
a subject; that they keep them, in some degree,
from theatres, taverns, billiard-tables, and other immortalities;
and that, moreover, they are a sort of
preparatory schools, wherein incipient legislators
may perfect themselves in declamation, mystification,
equivocation, and other indispensable requisites
for wordy war in after life. Oh misjudging fathers
of families! Is it more pernicious, think you, for
your offspring to injure the coats of their stomachs
by quaffing tumblers of brandy punch at a tavern,
than to sully their immortal minds by nightly
draughts of quibbles and sophistry? Is it worse to
play a straight hazard at a billard table, than to
learn habitually to undervalue truth, treating her
like a play-thing—a shuttlecock—to be bandied to
and fro as suits their convenience? Is it worse for
them to sit in a theatre and hear the divine poetry
of Shakspeare appropriately recited, than to be listening
to the dull speculations, or inflated bombast
of raw juveniles; or worse than that, perchance,
being themselves actively engaged in damaging the
English language, their vernacular, their respected
maternal or mother tongue? Is the quarrel scene
between Brutus and Cassius less to the purpose

-- 028 --

[figure description] Page 028.[end figure description]

than a fiery altercation between Master Cicero Timkins
and Master Demosthenes Simkins? Answer.

“But are these things so?” exclaims some unsuspecting,
kind-hearted father, or some amiable mother,
aroused, for the first time, to a sense of the danger
of her darling child, who has recently joined one
of those associations, and in whom she has latterly
remarked, with sorrow of heart, unequivocal symptoms
of obtrusiveness in company, and a rapid development
of the organs of obstinacy and self-will.
Trust me, dear madam, they are, and must of
necessity be so. I am not trifling with you. I am
no giddy boy, writing for a thimble-full of local
notoriety, but am myself a parent (of some six
weeks standing); and though of the more obtuse
(where feeling is concerned) or masculine gender,
know how to enter into a fond mother's fears on
such an occasion. Trust me, where one boy is
benefited by such societies, hundreds are injured
in their intellects, their morals, or their tempers.
Where one over-bashful youth is inoculated with
a little becoming self-possession, hundreds acquire a
degree of audacity, repulsive even in those who
have arrived at whiskers, but perfectly shocking in
persons of tender years; who, by the yet unstiffened
down upon their cheeks and chins, are reasonably
expected to be patterns of meekness and acquiescence.

-- 029 --

[figure description] Page 029.[end figure description]

But this is only a portion of the evils produced
by such unwholesome hotbeds for the forcing of
the intellect. The other natural consequences are
overweening pride, inflated notions of self, together
with contradictious, acrimonious, disputative habits,
which irresistibly prompt the unhappy possessors to
injure their friends, neighbors and acquaintance, by
committing, as it were, moral assaults upon them;
waylaying and deluding them, unawares, into out-of-the-way
controversies, knocking them down with
arguments or quotations, and then rifling them of
their quietude and peace of mind, and otherwise
maltreating and abusing them. Is such conduct
commendable? Is it decent? My dear madam, if
you would not have your son become a piece of unmixed
impertinence—an unamiability—a flatulency—
an after-dinner annoyance and a tea-table curse,
keep him away from debating societies.

After this affecting appeal, I think I see you turn
to your first-born, and, with tears in your eyes, exclaim—

“Oh, Ralph Nicholas, my love, go no more to
that place—it will not, and it cannot come to good.”

Madam, hand this lucubration across the table to
him, and conviction will stare him in the face; he
will yet be saved; and in the words of some great
moralist, “I will not have written altogether in vain.”

-- 030 --

[figure description] Page 030.[end figure description]

“But to take,” as the newspapers say, “a more
enlarged and comprehensive view of the subject.”
These abominations are spreading themselves with
awful rapidity over every section of the country.
In cities they abound, and are of every degree, from
bad to execrable. But worse than this: even in
the most (apparently) calm and sequestered villages—
sanctuaries for retirement and contemplation and
solemn thoughts—the demon of debate has established
a president's chair; and the propounding
and discussion of questions are carried on by the
rustics with a vigor and pertinacity that argue any
thing but well for the peace and quiet of the neighborhood.
Really, unless some remedial measures
be adopted, habitual disputation may become general,
and no man be safe. But what chiefly
alarms me, who partly believe in the transmission
of peculiar qualities of mind, as well as body, from
generation to generation, is, that this disease—this
moral blotch of wrangling and debating, becomes
rooted in the system; that what in our children is
only an acquired habit, may, in their children, and
their children's children, be a natural propensity!
I will be gathered to my fathers long ere that, and
therefore, cannot be supposed to be influenced by
any personal feeling in speaking thus; but, good
heavens! should it become hereditary! Then,

-- 031 --

[figure description] Page 031.[end figure description]

indeed, may the peaceable and well-disposed of afteryears—
those who have escaped the taint—be emphatically
said to have “fallen on evil days,” and
then will they exclaim, in the agony of their outraged
quiet,
“Oh, for a lodge in some vast wilderness!
Some boundless contiguity of shade!” But, perhaps, I am mournfully anticipative. Providence
grant it may be so. But no means should
be left untried to check the evil.

I will apostrophize; perchance it may act as a
dissuasive.

Oh, tender, callow youth, of sixteen and upwards,
listen! A voice from the olden time, even that of
the wisest among men, calleth unto thee—“my
son, get wisdom, and with all thy getting get understanding;”
and that thou may'st do so, discountenance
those talking, turbulent, truculent associations
for the effusion of the froth and scum of
oratory; eschew hot and bitter disputation—seek
not for truth amid wrangles, and quibbles, and disingenuous
paradoxes—consort not with such as
deal in them; but hie thee to thy silent chamber
and choose thy companions from the immortals,
from the demigods of thy “land's language.” Look
now, in this small room, what a goodly company
hast thou assembled around thee. What a

-- 032 --

[figure description] Page 032.[end figure description]

congregation of wits, sages, poets, and philosophers; and
all willing to be known to thy poor self. Insignificant
as thou art, how familiar may'st thou be with
Shakspeare, if it so please thee! John Milton will
not refuse thy acquaintance. Here is Swift, too,
divested of his rudeness; and Pope of his pettishness;
and “glorious John;” and Ben Jonson and
Sam Johnson, who take no offence whatever at the
unceremonious abbreviation of their baptismal cognomens.
If you wish to laugh, here are Butler
and Smollett, two right pleasant fellows, who will
speedily furnish you with an occasion; if you are
more attuned unto the “melting mood,” here are
Gray and Collins similarly disposed; and if you
are so unreasonable as to desire to laugh and cry
in the same breath, you can be accommodated, for
here is Laurence Sterne; and here, too, are witty
Farquhar, and wittier Congreve; and kindly-hearted
Oliver Goldsmith; and meek, melancholius
Cowper; and blithe, honest, ill-used Robie Burns;
and I know not how many more true-hearted,
sound-headed fellows, “merry and wise,” such as
the “antique Roman” or the Greek, or all that lived
before the days of “good Queen Bess,” never had
the honor of keeping company with. If you are
ambitious of an acquaintance with the leading literary
characters of your own times, here are Scott

-- 033 --

[figure description] Page 033.[end figure description]

Rogers, Campbell, Moore, &c. ready to waive the
ceremony of a formal introduction in your favor.

Are all these advantages—these opportunities of
“keeping the best of company,” to be lightly slighted?
Neglect them, and you will walk through the
world an idealess biped; cultivate them, and when
you go forth amid the mass of mortals, you will
see with eyes that they see not with, and hear with
ears that they hear not with; and, whether in the
crowded city or the solitary plain, the glittering ballroom
or the smoky cabin; amid the tumult of society
or the silence of nature, you will, at all times,
and on all occasions, have it in your power to reap
“The harvest of a quiet eye,
That broods on its own heart!”

-- 034 --

p091-038 RESPECTABILITY.

[figure description] Page 034.[end figure description]

Respectability! Mysterious word! indefinite
term! phantom! Who will presume to say authoritatively
what thou art? What metaphysician or
mental chemist will analyze thee, and expound to
the world the curious substance or essence of which
thou art composed? Where is the lexicographer
gifted with powers, subtle and fine as the spider's
thread, to define thee accurately, satisfactorily, so
that the general voice shall cry aloud, “that is the
meaning of the word;” and every individual whisper
to his neighbor, “that was my meaning.” As for
the explanations of the existing race of dictionaries,
they are mere evasions of the question.

About the boldest and most decided opinion concerning
this particle of the English language that I
am acquainted with, was that given by a witness in
a swindling transaction, who, on being asked by
the judge his reason for affirming that the defendant
was a respectable man, replied, “that he kept a
gig.” There is something in the unhesitating and

-- 035 --

[figure description] Page 035.[end figure description]

undoubting confidence of this answer, that carries
weight with it. The witness was well acquainted
with the defendant's moral obliquities; he knew
that he had long been worthy the attention of the
laws of his country; he knew, moreover, that he
was only enabled to maintain this two-wheeled
vehicle by a constant infringement of the right of
meum and tuum; he knew, in short, that he was
rich by good management and unhanged by good
luck; but still, there was no getting over the simple
fact—he kept his gig; and so long as he did keep
it, nothing could impugn his respectability in the
mind of the witness. Yet, before we unthinkingly
laugh at this man's tenacious adherence to his beau
ideal
of respectability, let us cautiously examine our
own thoughts on the subject. A gig is respectable.
A curricle may be dashing—a phaeton stylish—a
carriage genteel, lofty, magnificent—but a gig is
respectable par excellence. Yet, of itself, and independent
of other circumstances, it does not wholly
and safely constitute respectability, and here lies
the difficulty. It is not all in all—“there's the rub,”
or the question might be settled. Besides, its condition
must be looked to. It may be badly lined,
and worse painted; the shafts and wheels may be
in ill-condition; it may, in fact, have a disreputable
appearance rather than otherwise; it may be

-- 036 --

[figure description] Page 036.[end figure description]

second-handed. All these apparently trivial, but in
reality essential circumstances, are to be taken into
account before we can definitively pronounce upon
the respectability of the possessor; and it behoves
us to be cautious; for, to a nice mind, ardently engaged
in the pursuit of truth, a hair-breadth distinction
is found, at times, more obstinately irreconcileable
than a more manifest discrepancy.

Respectability! All-pervading power! like light
and life, thou art everywhere; or, at the least,
wherever civilization is, there art thou to be found,
despotically ruling the minds of men of every grade
and station, from the doctor to the dustman—from
the lawyer to the laborer. But of all the devotees,
none, I think, worship thee with the fervor—the
intenseness of shopkeepers and small tradesmen.
Thou art their idol—their oracle! They consult
thee in all they do or say, or in whatever in any
shape appertains to them. Thou art ever uppermost
in their thoughts, and there is no sacrifice too
great for them to make—no deprivation too severe
for them to endure, rather than to be banished
either in reality, or in the opinion of the world,
from thy presence. But though this race of people
are more peculiarly thine own, millions of others
put in their claim of kindred to thee on some trivial
pretext or other. Thou hast more distant relations

-- 037 --

[figure description] Page 037.[end figure description]

than a Scotchman likely to do well in the world,
even though his name be Campbell. And it is curious
to mark the different ways in which thy multitudinous
kith and kin infer a connection. Some
are respectable by descent, some by dress, some by
the situation of the dwellings in which they have
temporarily located themselves. A man in very
low circumstances, if he has no better claim, is
consanguineous on the strength of a hat with a
brim, or a stocking without a hole—“ two precious
items in a poor man's eye;” the spruce mechanic's
dapper coat, or his wife's silk gown, leave no doubt
in his own eyes at least, how closely he is allied;
the small tradesman's snug house, tiny flower-spot
before the door, and neat green railings, distinctly
mark him for thine own; while the more aristocratical
storekeeper in the wholesale or large retail
way, getting above business, successful ship-brokers,
cotton-speculators, lottery-office keepers, and other
anomalies, forgetful of all thou hast done for them,
look above thee, and creep into the back ranks of
gentility and fashion, where they remain neither
fish nor flesh—genteel in their own estimation,
simply respectable in that of their neighbors.

Some men neglect their personal appearance, and
concentrate their claims to respectability in a brass
knocker, a plate with their name engraved thereon,

-- 038 --

[figure description] Page 038.[end figure description]

venetian blinds, or any other pretty additament to
their domiciles; others are respectable by virtue of
their connexions; others by going to the private
boxes at the theatre; others by a pew next the parson
at church; others by the people they visit;
others by having every thing in season. Yet, difficult
as it is for the mind of man to comprehend all
these things, and to decide properly and justly, the
women, taking advantage of their superior powers
of penetration, and delicacy of discrimination, divide
and subdivide respectability as easily as quicksilver.
They have their “respectable sort of people—
very respectable—highly respectable—extremely
respectable—most respectable,” which makes the
thing about as difficult to understand or explain,
as political economy or electro-magnetism. Indeed,
there are some men, otherwise not deficient in intellect,
who never have even a glimmering of light
upon the subject. Think of the more than Egyptian
darkness of Robert Burns, for instance—mark
his heterodoxies,


“What though on hamely fare we dine,
Wear hodden gray and a' that,
Gie fools their silk, and knaves their wine,
A man's a man for a' that.”
No, sir, he is not a man; he is only a poor devil.
Or, grant that he is so by courtesy, what is a man

-- 039 --

[figure description] Page 039.[end figure description]

in these times, unless he is respectable according to
some of the floating laws and regulations on the
subject? “Oh, better had he ne'er been born!” for,
as the Persian sage justly remarketh—“he shall
drink of the waters of bitterness all the days of his
life, and his bread shall be as ashes in his mouth;
his face shall be near unto the earth, and he shall
be so small that his friends will look over his head
and see him not, even though the day be light—
and his shadow shall be less than the shadow of a
dog, or of a Russian, whom God destroy!”

Respectability is in and over all things. There
are respectable substances to eat, and drink, and
wear; there are respectable towns and streets and
situations—for men and houses. There is a shade
of respectability in colors. A black coat is more
respectable than a brown one—a white handkerchief
decidedly more so than a red one. Why this
is we cannot tell, we only know that it is so.

One of the immutable laws of nature is, that
doctors and lawyers shall wear black coats and
white handkerchiefs, and perhaps to this, in a large
degree, is owing the respectability which is so generally
conceded to those bodies. I speak not here
of lawyerlings and doctorlings—boys with scarcely
a tinge of their profession, who are injudiciously
abandoned in those matters to their own weak

-- 040 --

[figure description] Page 040.[end figure description]

judgments and perverted tastes, and who consequently
go abroad in josephean garments “of many
colors,” but of full-grown responsible men of law
and physic. Who would trust a life or a lawsuit
of any importance to one of either profession in a
pea-green coat, fancy waistcoat, and colored handkerchief?
the idea is preposterous. There is more
in those black and white habiliments than the unthinking
dream of.

-- 041 --

p091-045
Previous section

Next section


Fay, Theodore S. (Theodore Sedgwick), 1807-1898 [1833], Crayon sketches [ed.]. Volume 1 (Conner and Cooke, New York) [word count] [eaf091v1].
Powered by PhiloLogic